One Nation Under God

One Nation Under God

Friday, May 22, 2009

Pro-Abortion Lawyer Dawn Johnsen's Nomination Depends On Bipartisan Support.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

By William R. Collier

Jr. Representatives Virginia Foxx (North Carolina) and Eric Cantor (Virginia), both of whom happen to be Republican, spoke out in short speeches on the House Floor about the nomination of Dawn Johnsen for the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department.

The controversial nomination of extremely divisive nominees, especially in the area of abortion, by the Obama Administration continues to rely on party loyalty over principles which individuals claimed to hold when they ran for election, including many Democrats who claimed to be in the center or even center-right.

Many amongst the 51% of Americans who call themselves Pro-Life have been monitoring this nomination and are surprised to see that little real bipartisan opposition seems to be emerging. While the partisan support for radical pro-abortionists has enabled President Obama to nominate individuals who are extremely out of sync with moderate Pro-Choice advocates and Pro-Life advocates, who together include over 80% of the population, efforts are being made to bring the record of such nominees out before the public eye.

The nomination of Dawn Johnson has been opposed by The Susan B. Anthony List, which manages and funds Team Sarah, which sent a message in a recent email from SBA to its members as follows:

President Obama has nominated Dawn Johnsen to serve as an Assistant Attorney General to determine what is or isn’t Constitutional. Dawn Johnsen is an extremely divisive figure.

She has worked for the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project. She was the legal director for the National Abortion Rights Action League. She has compared pregnancy to slavery.

She has argued that the government should strip the Catholic Church and other religious denominations of their tax exempt status because of their pro-life advocacy. She believes that a pre-born child has no separate existence apart from the mother.

She has compared pro-life protesters to the Ku Klux Klan. She was heavily involved in the authorship of the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which would repeal every state and federal restriction on abortion. Johnsen has a long track record of intolerance to positions conflicting with her pro-abortion agenda. Type your name and contact information at the links below, and hit "Enter", to be taken to a page to write your Senators today. Tell them to vote against Dawn Johnsen nomination!

The SBA also provided a link for people to find out how to contact their Senators here:

http://www.sba-list.org/c.ddJBKJNsFqG/b.4179747/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?aid=11949

While some analysts have posited the idea that the Johnson nomination, on the hills of the Sebelius nomination that was passed largely along party lines but with some notable Republican defections, may face a more organized opposition and run into greater trouble, the discipline of the Democratic Party in keeping members in line has been strong, despite their election campaign rhetoric claiming to be in the center or even claiming to be conservatives, as Virginia's Jim Webb did in order to get elected in 2006.

The inability of the opposition to clearly speak with one voice and to get their message to the People directly, past a media filter that increasingly looks to some to be suspiciously similar to the talking points out of the Democratic Party and its front groups, has up until now allowed the Obama administration to fly under the public radar but, increasingly, online activists, including Team Sarah members, are finding their voice and their means of getting that voice out.

The probability is that as more and more voices are raised, each nomination of a radically divisive figure that holds extremist views that are out of sync with the mood and sentiments of the People, increases the risk of a long-term backlash that could bode ill for every Democrat who claimed to have been "moderate" or "centrist" but who voted, rubber stamp style, for whatever the Party asked them to vote for.

http://sarahpalinblog.typepad.com/sarah_palin/2009/05/dawn-johnsens-nomination-depends-on-partisan-support.html

Posted By Cecilia Trent

Friday, May 1, 2009

CDC: 56,000 Dead from Flu...in 2006

From CNSNews.com

Friday, May 01, 2009
By Matt Cover

Posted by Cecilia Trent

(CNSNews.com) – So far this year only one person--a baby visiting from Mexico--has died of swine flu in the United States, but more than 56,000 people died from the flu in the United States in 2006, the most recent year for which data is available, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

In 2005, the flu killed 63,001 people in the United States, according to the CDC. But that year the President of the United States did not use a primetime news conference to admonish the American people that they must wash their hands, and the Vice President did not say he would not want his family to have to ride on a plane or a subway because someone might sneeze near them.

An average of 36,171 people died each year of flu in the United States from 1993 to 2003, according to a recent CDC study.

Despite the recent fervor surrounding swine flu, conventional flu viruses have killed far more people than other, more publicized, strains in recent years. Avian flu, for example, has killed 257 people worldwide since 2003, according to the World Health Organization. It has killed no people at all in the United States.

Other not-well-publicized infectious diseases also have very high death rates compared to the swine flu has doen so far.

Septicemia, or blood infection, killed 34,234 Americans in 2006, the vast majority of whom were senior citizens, the same group that makes up the majority of flu-related deaths.

HIV-- the virus that causes AIDS--killed 12,113 people in 2006. Of those, 8,387 were between the ages of 35 to 54. The CDC reports that 75 percent of Americans who die from HIV are men who contract the disease through homosexual acts or intravenous drug use.

Intestinal infections caused by the clostridium difficile bacterium killed 6,225 people in 2006. Clostridium difficile is a bacterium found in human feces which normally infects elderly people during hospital stays or when they are on strong antibiotics.

Hepatitis, a disease frequently spread through sexual contact or drug use, killed 7,250 people, while meningitis--typically spread through poor hygiene and sanitation--killed 634.

Meanwhile, the current swine flu outbreak has claimed the life of one person, who did not contract the disease in the United States--and 168 people in Mexico.

On Thursday, Vice President Joe Biden told viewers of NBC’s Today show that he wouldn’t be going anywhere in a confined place such as a train or airplane, due to the outbreak of swine flu.

“I would tell members of my family--and I have--that I wouldn’t go anywhere in confined places,” Biden said. “It’s not just going to Mexico--if you’re in a confined aircraft and one person sneezes it goes all the way through the aircraft.”

President Obama recommended that Americans have a swine-flu contingency plan in place, should the current outbreak intensify. He made no mention of other diseases that have killed more Americans.

“(W)e’ve recommended that both parents and businesses think about contingency plans,” the President said. “I’ve asked every American to take the same steps you would take to prevent any other flu: keep your hands washed; cover your mouth when you cough; stay home from work if you're sick; and keep your children home from school if they're sick.”

Posted by Cecilia Trent

The Obama Flu?

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Joe Biden Said What?..........................

White house is trying to downplay good ol Joe's latest Gaffe. They should put a muzzle on him and be done with it.

http://www.politico.com/singletitlevideo.html?bcpid=1155201977&bctid=21663931001


Excerp from Politico:

Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he would not recommend taking any commercial flight or riding in a subway car “at this point” because swine flu virus can spread “in confined places.” A little more than one hour later, Biden rushed out a statement backing off.

“I would tell members of my family — and I have — I wouldn’t go anywhere in confined places now,” Biden said on NBC’s “Today” show.. “It’s not that it’s going to Mexico. It’s [that] you’re in a confined aircraft. When one person sneezes, it goes all the way through the aircraft. That’s me. …

“So, from my perspective, what it relates to is mitigation. If you’re out in the middle of a field when someone sneezes, that’s one thing. If you’re in a closed aircraft or closed container or closed car or closed classroom, it’s a different thing.”

That contradicted more restrained advice from President Barack Obama and the federal government — and the last thing the White House wants to do right now is shut down the airline industry and big-city subways out of mass panic.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21925.html

Posted by Cecilia Trent

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Vote No On Hate Crime Legislation

April 28, 2000

The House Judiciary Committee has already approved H.R. 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Now it comes to a full vote on the floor of the House of Representatives.

This legislation is an attack on freedom of speech guaranteed to every American by the First Amendment.

The bill will make it a federal crime to cause harm to someone who is a member of a group protected under this law. Groups will be defined based on gender, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation and various social factors.

If passed, this bill can also be used to limit freedom of expression in churches.

Tell your representative that freedom of thought is not a crime.

++ Contact your representative now!

Posted By Cecilia Trent

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Black Clergy Lead Protest Against Gay Marriage

Posted By Cecilia Trent
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Headlines/Default.aspx?id=507786

WASHINGTON - Black clergy have led a rally against homosexual marriage in the nation's capital.

The Washington, D.C., city council voted unanimously this month to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states where they're legal. Before becoming law, the legislation requires a final council vote next week and then must be reviewed by Congress, which has final say over the city's laws.


But local clergy told about 200 supporters that God created marriage as the union of a man and a woman, and governments have no right to change it.


The ministers also insisted that gay marriage is not a civil right, and led the mostly black crowd in singing "We Shall Overcome" to suggest that their religious view might prevail.


City councilman and former Mayor Marion Berry, who missed the first council vote, led about 200 protesters in chanting, "No to same-sex marriage in D.C.!"

Will this story get the same attention and produce the same level of hatred and criticism that Miss California continues to endure for her stance on traditional marriage? No of course not. It would not be politically correct.

Posted By
Cecilia Trent

Cecilia Trent...What Exactly Did Obama Supporters Know?

Remember the overwhelming controversy regarding the Zogby Poll that proved that the majority of Obama supporters were uninformed? Well howobamagotelected.com has commissioned a new poll to find out how McCain supporters would fare. The results are not surprising.

Wilson Research Poll


The 12 "Zogby" questions were duplicated, one on the Keating scandal was added for extra balance. The results from Obama voters were virtually IDENTICAL in both polls.

Here are the highlights:

35 % of McCain voters got 10 or more of 13 questions correct.

18% of Obama voters got 10 or more of 13 questions correct.

McCain voters knew which party controls congress by a 63-27 margin.

Obama voters got the “congressional control” question wrong by 43-41.

Those that got "congressional control" correct voted 56-43 for McCain.

Those that got "congressional control" wrong voted 65-35 for Obama.

The poll also asked voters to name all the media sources from which they got information.

Those “exposed” to Fox News got "congressional control" correct 64-25 (+39)

Those “exposed” to CNN got “congressional control” correct 48-38 (+10)

Those “exposed” to Network news got “congressional control” correct 48-39 (+9)

Those “exposed” to print media got “congressional control” correct 52-37 (+15)

Those “exposed” to MSNBC got “congressional control” correct 55-35 (+20)

Those “exposed” to talk radio got “congressional control” correct 61-29 (+32)

Voters in the "South" had the best response rate on “congressional control” (+22)

Voters in the "Northeast" had the worst response rate on “congressional control” (+9)

Those “exposed” to Fox News voted 70-29 for McCain.

Those “exposed” to CNN voted 63-37 for Obama.

Those “exposed” to MSNBC voted 73-26 for Obama.

Those “exposed” to network newscasts voted 62-37 for Obama.

Those “exposed” to national newspapers voted 64-36 for Obama.

Those “exposed” to talk radio voted 61-38 for McCain.

Those that could associate Bill Ayers' name/story with Obama voted 52-48 for McCain (We added Ayers name to the "Zogby" question and it significantly increased the rate of correct response, indicating a very superficial grasp of the overall story).

Those that knew Obama had made negative comments about “coal power plants" voted 76-24 for McCain.

Those that knew Obama had his opponents knocked off the ballot in his first campaign voted 66-34 for McCain.
McCain voters did poorly (only 42% correct) onteh Keating question and,in general, the voters did universally worse on questions where the negative information was about their candidate

Women under 55 did worse than they might have by guessing on four of the thirteen questions, and yet 95% of them knew that Palin was the candidate with a pregnant teenage daughter. Even 95% of those in this demographic group who didn't know “congressional control” got this question correct.

Those “exposed” to MSNBC “scored” 90% correct on the three Palin questions (including an incredible 98% on the “pregnant teenage daughter” question), while those not “exposed” to MSNBC averaged 84% correct on those three questions.

See full poll results at http://howobamagotelected.com/